The day I lost my mind

lost my mind: photograph of a brain lying on the road. Photo attribution: Flickr user thegeekshallinherittheearth

Saturday

On Saturday I lost my mind.

While alone in my Vermont home I suffered a spell of transient global amnesia (TGA), a rare mental condition.

“A person having an attack of TGA has almost no capacity to establish new memories, but generally appears otherwise mentally alert and lucid, possessing full knowledge of self-identity and identity of close family, and maintaining intact perceptual skills and a wide repertoire of complex learned behavior. The individual simply cannot recall anything that happened outside the last few minutes, while memory for more temporally distant events may or may not be largely intact.”
—Wikipedia

I have no clear memory from around noon through 6 p.m. when I found myself in an emergency room hospital bed.

Here’s what I’ve reconstructed from others’ accounts:

I’ll never know what happened the first few hours, as there was no one with me. Around 3 pm my son called about his taxes and I spoke to him for a few minutes before he had to interrupt the call. When he called back five minutes later I had no memory of him calling. “Dad,” he said, “you sound strange. Are you stoned?” I indignantly told him I wasn’t. “Perhaps you should call Mom,” he suggested.

I didn’t remember where my wife was, which did not seem especially strange to me. Checking my computer calendar, I clicked on Today and saw Celia was in Boston. I couldn’t remember why she was there or what day it was. I kept looking at the calendar to remind myself and promptly forgot. Somehow I called Celia and said, “My brain isn’t working properly.” She phoned our neighbors and, luckily, Jim was in and came to our house. Celia, trained as an occupational therapist and very worried that I had had a stroke, asked Jim to have me raise both hands and smile. I obeyed his request and had no problem. She called the local hospital and they decided to have Jim bring me there while she drove home for two hours at high speed.

I have no memory of driving with Jim to the hospital or of being admitted.

My TGA experience

It felt like I was dreaming. In the middle of a dream, one’s experience of the moment seems normal, but memories of prior moments vanish almost immediately.

But this was a waking dream.

Unlike some TGA victims, I was not agitated or angry. Instead, I was curious about what was going on and continually attempted to use available higher-functioning memory aids—my computer calendar, phone, and the people around me—to regain an understanding of what was happening. I had limited success and repeated my questions and observations over and over again.

“It’s like being in a dream.”

“When did you get here?”

“I wouldn’t recommend this.”

“This is really bizarre.”

I had no idea I was repeating these phrases every five to ten minutes.

I remember Jim being with me shortly before he left, and Celia arriving. During Celia’s frantic drive home, Jim’s wife told her that her brother-in-law had experienced what I was going through, that it might be something called transient global amnesia, and I would probably be fine. By the time Celia arrived at my hospital bed, the ER head doctor had ruled out a stroke and diagnosed me with TGA.

We stayed in the ER while my short-term memory continued to improve. Time seemed to pass oddly; I’d look at my watch and discover an hour had gone by in a flash. I became aware that I was repeating myself. Finally, it was clear that I was improving. Discharged at midnight, Celia drove me home where, exhausted, we both went to sleep.

After I lost my mind

On Sunday my short-term memory was pretty much back. There was a weird hole in my memory of the previous day, a disquieting haze. I tried to fill it in with the recollections of others, but it remained a caricature of memory, one not experienced directly by me but constructed from external reports.

I am thankful that I am back to normal, whatever “normal” means. My experience has given me a glimpse of the amazing operation of our brains, by showing for a moment what can happen when something goes haywire. Celia suffered more than me, shouldering the terrible worry that I would be impaired permanently. By the time I was aware that something abnormal had happened, I was on the mend.

As the days pass, my TGA grows distant, shading into my normal imperfect memory of the past. It is increasingly hard to conjure up the sheer strangeness of the experience.

Perhaps that’s just as well.

Note: Transient global amnesia is rare (2-5 people per 100,000), is unlikely to reoccur, and, though there are various theories, has no clear cause.

Photo attribution: Flickr user thegeekshallinherittheearth

The moment when you know

moment when you know: photograph of a bearded man looking into the camera. Photo attribution: Flickr user zilverbat.Sometimes you meet someone again, perhaps someone you haven’t seen for a long time, and you connect through the eyes and you both know, in that moment, the love you have for each other. The love may be buried deep in one of you. Hidden under hard, seemingly impenetrable layers that have built up over the years. The moment is only a flicker and it’s gone—buried again. But in that moment you know.

Remember it.

Treasure it.

Photo attribution: Flickr user zilverbat

How the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator changed my life

Myers-Briggs Type IndicatorNo, this is not a song of praise for the most widely administered “personality assessment tool” (over two million taken every year-get yours now!), the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). Rather, it’s a story about how the MBTI helped me understand something important about my life.

I take the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

I first took the MBTI in 2002, at the start of Jerry Weinberg’s transformative Problem Solving Leadership Workshop. Having filled out a paper multiple-choice questionnaire, I self-scored it. I ended up with the four letters of my MBTI “type”.

Haven’t taken the test? I should explain that the MBTI looks at eight “personality preferences” organized into four opposite pairs. Everyone who takes the assessment ends up with one of the 16 possible combinations of the four pairs.

But, what is rarely emphasized is that the scores also provide information on the strength of the preference towards one or other opposites of each pair.

An illustration of the MBTI's Four Preferences:
Extraversion versus Introversion
Sensing versus Intuition
Thinking versus Feeling
Judgment versus Perception

In my case, the assessment told me that I was a strong NF (intuitive feeler preference) and weak on the introversion-extroversion and judgment-perception axes. For what it’s worth, I’ve taken the MBTI multiple times since, and these results have stayed consistent, apart from a slight drift from weak introvert to weak extrovert over the years.

One way of looking at the MBTI preferences is to group them into temperament pairs (SJ guardians, SP artisans, NF idealists, and NT rationals). Strong NFs are “catalysts, spokespeople, energizers“, they “persuade people about values and inspirations“, to do their best work they need “personal meaning and congruence with who they are“, they are acknowledged for contributing “something unique or a special vision of possibilities“. [All quotes taken from “Introduction to Type in Organizations“, Krebs Hirsh et al.]

Insights from my Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Learning I was a strong NF gave me an important insight into my career path over the previous thirty years. I started as an elementary particle physicist, gave up academia to form a solar manufacturing business, and then taught computer science and consulted on information technology issues until my mid 50’s. The whole time I felt a need to organize and run conferences around these topics, and I didn’t understand why.

Suddenly the arc of my professional life made sense. I had been continuously moving away from the T-focused (Thinking) work that I was good at. I’d been moving towards the people-oriented/inspirational/consensus-seeking work I strongly preferred. My thirty years of organizing conferences had been about facilitating connections between people. This was a preference of mine that I had always been drawn to but never acknowledged.

Jerry’s workshop started me on a more conscious journey. That journey led to my decision to retire from information technology consulting and write a book about what I had learned about designing, organizing, and facilitating participant-driven conferences.

And here I am.

Why I think the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator is useful

Perhaps the most common error made about the MBTI is to think that it’s about ability. If you misinterpret the assessment in this way it becomes limiting. “I can’t do that because I’m not the right type.” When you realize it’s a tool to explore preferences, these limits fall away. I can still use my thinking ability in everything I do. But knowing that my preferences and hence my mission are for NF-type activities helps me understand who I am and what I might want to do in the present and future.

There is a classic MBTI exercise that divides a group into four temperaments. Each temperament group then decides on and shares what their ideal organization would look like. Try it if you ever get the chance! Each group finds it easy to agree internally. Yet each group’s answer is so amusingly and utterly different from the others that it’s hard to maintain that the MBTI doesn’t provide at least some interesting insight into personal preferences.

I’m not a fan of MBTI as a management tool. (Not that I’ve had many opportunities to apply it that way.) But I do think it can provide useful personal insight. It did in my case, at any rate.

Thanks to Johnnie Moore for inspiring this post via his post on MBTI limitations!

INTP Motivational poster by Greg Davis

MBTI pairs image by Jan Dillis

What we can learn from the man who had no problems

photograph of a candy wrapper, torn at the corner, with the name "no" in large pink letters. A sticker has been added that says "problem". Photo credit: Flick user themaxsons
During a conference session I was facilitating recently, I met a man—I’ll call him Paul—who had no problems. Since the session was described as an opportunity to get answers from a small group of your peers to problems you were having in your professional life, I found Paul’s attendance surprising. “If you have no problems, why are you here?” was my first question. “I just came to help.” was Paul’s reply.

The group of peers at his table questioned Paul further. Paul apparently had no problems at work at all. His boss loved his performance. Paul felt happy and fulfilled at his job. Even one of my favorite questions in circumstances like these—So Paul, if you had a problem, what would it be? (It’s surprising how often this works!)—elicited a short silence followed by a further protestation of problemlessness. Just to see how far we could go, I asked Paul if he had a problem with any aspect of his life. “Well,” Paul admitted, “I’m no longer married.” I allowed that this problem was outside the scope of our session, and we moved on to the next participant.

Of course, as my mentor Jerry Weinberg wrote long agoThere’s always a problem. I don’t know for sure, but perhaps Paul’s biggest problem was that he was in denial about his problems.

Whatever the reason, Paul missed a great chance to work on some important aspects of his professional life. It’s rare to be offered such an opportunity, but, as we can see from Paul’s example, it’s still possible to turn it down.

Don’t.

Photo credit: Flick user themaxsons

It wasn’t the lobster: How we often do work we don’t notice

work we don't notice: photograph of a bright red cooked lobster with bands around its claws, sitting on a plate on a dining table. Image attribution: Flickr user subinev

Work we don’t notice

Do you know that we do work we don’t notice?

During the summer of 1993, I was dining with my wife, Celia, at a Maine shoreline restaurant. I still remember our wooden table with the red and white check plastic tablecloth. I had just consumed an excellent lobster and a pint of beer and felt more relaxed than I had felt for many months.

Leaning back, well-fed, I had no inkling what was about to happen. And then, suddenly, out of my mouth came these words:

“I think I’d like to give up working at Marlboro.”

My professional life was hectic. I had a full-time salaried position at Marlboro College, teaching half-time and running the IT department half-time. I was also freelance consulting half-time. Oh, and the first two half-time positions were, in reality, more like three-quarter-time commitments.

You can do the math.

Until that seafood-fueled moment, I had never consciously thought about making any kind of drastic change in my work life. And yet, as soon as the words were out of my mouth I became aware that I was going to resign from the college and move to full-time consulting work.

And it felt right.

How did I get there?

Well, ultimately, it wasn’t the lobster or the beer that caused this epiphany—they were just the welcome catalysts. I’ve written elsewhere about how you can learn from stories that resonate, but there was no resonance here.

Instead, my relaxing meal provided an opportunity for months of underlying percolating work to emerge. We often do work that we don’t notice. While steeped in the stress and the toll that long workdays were taking on my life, I didn’t notice the analysis and unconscious calculation of risks and tradeoffs that were bubbling under the surface; the hard, drawn-out preparation needed to make such a drastic change in my professional life.

Looking back, I remember a moment in Maine when I moved from employee to self-employed, and I call it an intuitive choice. Perhaps this is what intuition is: a sudden realization of a conclusion from steady unconscious processing of our experiences. Whatever the mechanism, I believe that we have significant unconscious resources that can often help us respond effectively to difficult situations. How we bring them into our consciousness is for you to discover. Perhaps lobster and a beer?

Have you ever experienced this kind of sudden insight in your life? Please share your story!

Image attribution: Flickr user subinev

Trapped in an elevator with a Nobel Prize winner

Trapped in an elevator. An elevator at CERN: Image attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/marc_buehler/ / CC BY-NC 2.0

“We don’t have a word for learning and teaching at the same time, but our schooling would improve if we did.”—Kevin Kelly, Out of Control.

One afternoon in 1975, I entered an elevator at CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research near Geneva, Switzerland. In the elevator was Professor R, the future recipient of a Nobel Prize, and generally regarded by lowly graduate students like me as a physics god. We were alone, on our way to a lecture he was giving. As he ignored me, the door slid shut, and we began to rise.

Abruptly, the elevator shuddered to a stop between floors.

We stood, not speaking, waiting for something to happen. Some thirty seconds went by, but we did not move.

Professor R swung towards the elevator control panel. He started pushing the buttons. Nothing happened. He pushed the buttons again. We remained motionless.

I was trapped in an elevator with a physics god.

And then Professor R began to shout.

It was clear to me that panic didn’t drive his outburst. He yelled at the elevator because he was angry that a mere elevator could delay an important man. His anger was automatic, a habitual response when things didn’t go his way.

I stood, saying nothing. There was an intercom on the elevator panel, and I wondered how long it would be before Professor R calmed down enough for me to suggest we use it. Meanwhile, we were trapped in an elevator together.

He was still shouting when the elevator started upwards smoothly as if nothing had happened. Professor R stopped yelling. We stood for a few seconds, avoiding eye contact until the elevator arrived at our floor and the door opened. The physics god rushed out.

The lecture started ten minutes later. As I sat in the audience, Professor R showed no sign that our little elevator incident had ever occurred.

Later I learned that my momentary elevator companion was notorious for angry outbursts when he didn’t get his way. No one who knew him was surprised to hear my experience.

Initially, I thought my brief encounter with a famous person had just given me a good story to tell. It took a while before I realized what I had learned in the elevator.

***

Our children are born dependent on us. We supply sustenance, shelter, and protection from perils. As they grow they learn. At first sight, it seems that their learning is a one-way street. What can we learn from children?

We can relearn how to learn—if we pay attention. When my younger granddaughter, Kayla was two I’d see her every few weeks. The changes I noticed between visits were striking. At one visit it was clear from how she reacted that she understood what I said to her, but she didn’t speak more than a word or two. Three weeks later, she repeated the last word of everything I said to her; at the following visit she was creating two-word sentences; at the next, I heard a four-word phrase; at the next when she said something I didn’t understand, she patiently repeated herself, perhaps changing a word or two. Now four years old, she is still fearless at experimenting with her world through ceaseless play, is cheerfully curious, life fascinates her, she is resilient and persistent, she is open to new ideas and experiences, and she is spontaneous.

Professor R, on the other hand, had forgotten how to learn in the ways that Kayla does. We all seem to move in this direction later in childhood, perhaps because our increased awareness of social context causes us to self-censor natural curiosity and willingness to experiment. Right now, Kayla is out of control of her life most of the time because there are so many things she doesn’t understand, and because the adults around her steer her life in so many ways. And she responds to this state of affairs with great curiosity and ingenuity. For less than a minute Professor R experienced being out of control of his life, but for him, a new situation, a stuck elevator, evoked only anger.

Professor R understood more about physics than I ever have or will, but that day I discovered that I was wiser than him in at least one way. I knew that when you experience minor setbacks, there are better alternatives than exploding with anger. Until that day at CERN, I had assumed that the people society had provided as my teachers must be smarter than me in every way. Professor R showed me that this belief was wrong, and, over time, this realization has fundamentally blurred how I see the relationship between student and teacher.

I now believe I have something to contribute to everyone and I can learn something from everyone. And that this is true for other adults too.

***

And this is why a peer conference de-emphasizes pre-determined official roles. Attendees figure out for themselves who and what is of value to them, and the conference format supports the resulting connections with relevant topics and people. No one makes prior assumptions about who is valuable and what should be discussed, and people move as needed between teaching and learning, moment to moment.

One can look back at a moment between two individuals and say: at that moment she was the teacher and he was the student. But in the present moment, we have no way of knowing the role we may be in. There is a joy in living in a way that avoids preconceptions about our role, and that, in the process, opens us up to new experiences and learning that would otherwise pass us by.

I don’t recommend being trapped in an elevator with a Nobel Prize winner. But I certainly learned a lot during my short time with Professor R.

Image attribution: http://www.flickr.com/photos/marc_buehler/ / CC BY-NC 2.0