It took less than ten years from the birth of the World Wide Web for its static, read-only, broadcast-style websites (Web 1.0) to be superseded by read-write, social websites (Web 2.0), where participation and collaboration are key. Unfortunately, we’ve been running Conference 1.0 for over three hundred years, with no significant updates. (Is PowerPoint that superior to a blackboard?) It’s time for Conference 2.0.
But first, what’s Conference 1.0?
Conference 1.0
Conference 1.0 is characterized by:
- A small organizing group predetermines conference programs.
- Distinctions between presenters (teachers) and attendees (learners).
- A few speakers, at most, dominate sessions.
- Some combination of general and breakout sessions.
- Long, uninterrupted broadcast content.
- Networking opportunities are relegated to meals & social events outside the program sessions.
Amazingly, after no change for three centuries, the last thirty years have seen the rise of a different kind of conference.
Conference 2.0
Conference 2.0 is characterized by:
- Attendees determine programs, schedules, and activities.
- The blurring of teacher and learner as fixed roles; a teacher at one moment may be a learner the next.
- “The people formerly known as the audience” actively participate and contribute to sessions.
- A wide range of session formats: small group discussions, Ignite & Pecha Kucha, simulations, workshops, etc., coupled with few or no general sessions.
- Frequent participatory learning opportunities for attendees break up long sessions.
- Conference designs that directly facilitate, support, and encourage connections and networking between attendees.
The move to Conference 2.0 will be much slower than the transition from Web 1.0 to 2.0, because Conference 1.0 has been our dominant modality for adult face-to-face learning for so long, and it’s hard to change entrenched culture. And yet, year by year, assisted by the impact of the rise of online, Conference 2.0 designs have become better known, and their advantages experienced by more and more people.
Not one of the 500 most popular websites today is a Web 1.0 design. I believe that, over time, a similar transition from Conference 1.0 to 2.0 will occur. Whether it takes five years or a hundred years is up to you.
What are you doing to prepare for the demise of Conference 1.0? Do you organize conferences, but haven’t experienced Conference 2.0 yet? What are you waiting for?
Hey Adrian,
came here via Viv McWaters site. Conference 1.0s make me lose the will to live! I thought you might like a couple of conference 2.0 things that I have written/made.
One is a re-imagining of a really static “chalk and talk/the sage on the stage” thing. It’s called “From top down to participatory – a funny thing could have happened on the way to the forum.”
http://dwighttowers.wordpress.com/2011/05/24/from-top-down-to-participatory-a-funny-thing-could-have-happened-on-the-way-to-the-forum/
The second is a youtube video (pretty crudely done, but does what it needs to) called “From Cannon-Fodder to Ego-Fodder” (arguing that in the same way troops in World War 1 were cannon fodder, the audiences at what you call Conference 1 are similarly mown down by the egos of the speakers and the organisations hosting the conference).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vFOC-tTxh3s
Hope you find this a little interesting.
Now, to continue looking around your site!!
Love both of these, Dwight! Want to meet you f2f, but Australia is a long way away… Do you Skype?