Leaving Las Twitter

Still from the 1995 movie "Leaving Las Vegas" of alcoholic Hollywood screenwriter Ben Sanderson (Nicolas Cage) sitting in a Las Vegas cocktail lounge, staring at a Martini as he drinks himself into oblivion. A speech bubble says "Goodbye Twitter".
Still from the 1995 movie “Leaving Las Vegas” of alcoholic Hollywood screenwriter Ben Sanderson (Nicolas Cage) sitting in a Las Vegas cocktail lounge, staring at a Martini as he drinks himself into oblivion.

On November 14, 2024, I said goodbye to Twitter

Like hundreds of thousands of users in the weeks following the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election, I decided it was time to leave Twitter. How did someone like me —who thrived on the platform for years, posting over 80,000 tweets and amassing more than 8,000 followers — decide to move on? And where did I go?

Here’s the story.

Twitter: The early days of wonder and delight

I joined Twitter (now “X”) in June 2009. Little did I know that, over the next few years, Twitter would become the most important way for people to discover my work and for me to connect with thousands of kindred spirits worldwide who share my specialized interests. Over time, this website Conferences That Work grew to six million page views in 2023.

Why did this happen? In its early years, Twitter was small and authentic. Tweets were public, fostering organic discovery of fascinating people and communities, often defined by hashtags. Two vibrant communities I called home for years were #eventprofs and #assnchat.

But in 2017, I noticed a change. In retrospect, 2016-2107 marked a transition where late adopters continued to join Twitter. However, a critical mass of active users concluded that engagement on the platform was not for them. They began moving to other social media platforms, like Instagram and, later, TikTok. Twitter became a platform more suited for consuming breaking news and rumors than meaningful interaction.

The Elon Era: From Bad to Worse

Everything changed in October 2022 when Elon Musk took over. Over the next two years, he destroyed what was left of Twitter’s value. He promoted accounts that paid for meaningless “blue check” verification and eliminated content moderation rules. Elon’s evisceration of safety guidelines and enforcement filled the platform with a toxic stew of bigots, anonymous haters, and misinformation bots.

As quality advertisers fled the platform, Twitter’s desperate need for revenue led Musk to allow a barrage of low-quality ads from companies you’ve never heard of. It didn’t help the bottom line.

I stayed for a while, continuing to post evergreen content and links to the weekly blog posts I’ve written since 2009. But as my community began leaving in droves, engagement plummeted, replaced by toxicity and hostility.

The final straws

Several events pushed me to finally leave:

  1. Elon’s PropagandaMusk used Twitter to support his public transformation to a vocal 45 supporter, armed with a slew of lies and distortions. This disgusted me and countless other longtime users.
  2. Blocking Changes: In October 2024, Twitter announced that blocked accounts could still view your posts, making the platform feel even less safe for many.
  3. The final straw—AI Exploitation: Twitter updated its Terms of Service to state that, as of November 15, 2024, all posts and attached media would be used to train AI models like Grok.

I stopped posting on Twitter on November 14, except for a week of tweets of this post, bidding the platform farewell.

Where did I go?

Most Twitter emigrants are moving to Bluesky, a rival social media platform. While Bluesky is currently a better place to be than Xitter, I have some concerns about its long-term prospects, summarized in this popular post I made on Mastodon:

Mastodon post by Adrian Segar on November 16, 2024. Considering Bluesky? Please bear in mind that #Bluesky is: -Funded by #BlockchainCapital: • co-founded by Steve Bannon pal Brock Pierce, a major crypto advocate, and close friend of Eric Adams • run in part by Kirill Dorofeev, who also works for #VK, Russia's state social network. —A venture-funded startup, so once they need to monetize they're likely to turn to an exploitative business model. Sources: @davetroy, @thenexusofprivacy 11 responses 235 boosts 183 favorites

Considering Bluesky?

Please bear in mind that #Bluesky is:

—Funded by #BlockchainCapital:
• co-founded by Steve Bannon pal Brock Pierce, a major crypto advocate, and close friend of Eric Adams
• run in part by Kirill Dorofeev, who also works for #VK, Russia’s state social network.

—A venture-funded startup, so once they need to monetize they’re likely to turn to an exploitative business model.

Sources: @davetroy, @thenexusofprivacy

Nov 16, 2024, at 01:53 PM
183 favorites
235 boosts

Science fiction author, activist, and journalist Cory Doctorow also aptly warns about Bluesky in his post Bluesky and enshittification: “[I will] never again devote my energies to building up an audience on a platform whose management can sever my relationship to that audience at will.”

Currently, there are only two major social media platforms that aren’t owned by billionaires tech giants: Mastodon and the quaintly charming CounterSocial (here’s an old review of CounterSocial).

Why Mastodon?

I joined Mastodon in November 2022 and have never looked back. Though I have only 400+ followers, Mastodon reminds me of what Twitter used to be. Mastodon is a supportive community that values thoughtful posts. I get far more engagement and exposure there than I did on Twitter. Since I started posting my content on Mastodon, visits to this website have jumped 20%. You can find me there at [email protected].

[Full disclosure:  you can also still find me, albeit reluctantly, on LinkedIn for professional networking reasons, plus, even more reluctantly, on Facebook for some local groups and staying in touch with a few friends who aren’t on anything else.]

Goodbye Twitter

Twitter was a transformative platform during its heyday, and I’m grateful for the connections and opportunities it brought me. But it’s no longer the place it once was.

Goodbye, Twitter. We had fun while it lasted—until a billionaire ruined it.

I’m leaving Las Twitter.

Mastodon is the old Twitter

I joined the social media platform Mastodon a year ago. Given recent turbulent social media trends, I’m glad I took the plunge. Having been on Twitter (yes, I know it’s been renamed “X”, sue me) since 2009, I’d describe Mastodon as the old Twitter.

What do I mean by that?

What Twitter is now

Ever since Twitter’s creation in 2006, people have used it in different ways. Many have striven for massive follower counts and social media “influence”. Others, like myself, have enjoyed the platform’s often-strained ability to discover and sustain communities of interest on a myriad of topics. From my viewpoint, the platform’s popularity and usefulness reached a peak between 2014 – 2017. Since then, Twitter began a slow decline. (See the graph of my monthly website pageviews below.) That is, until Elon Musk took over Twitter in October 2022, and its status as a stable social media platform rapidly imploded, leading to the following colorful comparison by Phil Smith of Twitter versus Mastodon in November 2022…

Mastodon is the old Twitter: https://mastodon.social/@phil_smith@mastodonapp.uk/109308270032794294 Phil Smith @phil_smith@mastodonapp.uk #Twitter vs #Mastodon Twitter is like a top of the range Lamborghini but you’re trapped in the boot full of broken bottles and it’s being driven over a cliff by a madman. Mastodon is like sitting in the back of a dilapidated VW camper van, with knackered suspension, no air conditioning, but lots of nice passengers having a sing-song and there’s a dog called Mr. Snuffles.

“#Twitter vs #Mastodon

Twitter is like a top-of-the-range Lamborghini but you’re trapped in the boot full of broken bottles and it’s being driven over a cliff by a madman.

Mastodon is like sitting in the back of a dilapidated VW camper van, with knackered suspension, no air conditioning, but lots of nice passengers having a sing-song and there’s a dog called Mr. Snuffles.”

Phil Smith November 8, 2022

Now I don’t agree that Mastodon is the kind of hippy-dippy place that Phil Smith characterizes, though it includes some of that vibe. Counter Social is a much better fit, as described in my post Alternatives to Twitter.

Enshittification

I think most people agree that Twitter has gone through more upheavals in the last year than in the five previous years combined. Twitter under Musk is an example of rapid enshittification, a term coined by Cory Doctorow describing what happens “where a platform sits between buyers and sellers, hold each hostage to the other, raking off an ever-larger share of the value that passes between them.”

I, and many others, have written about the increase in toxicity on Twitter since Musk took over. I won’t say more here.

With ~8,400 followers on Twitter, I have seen engagement with my posts plunge 50% over the last year. Part of this is due to some of my most active followers leaving Twitter. But I think that Musk’s decision to prioritize tweets without links is another factor. Recently I’ve noticed that my retweets of and comments on posts receive 50 times more engagement than my regular tweets-with-links. This didn’t used to be the case.

I’ve used Twitter for 16 years to create, discover, and support many communities of practice. Until recently, it was still possible to hold conversations there. But today, Twitter is a morass of people shouting at each other. Very little listening is going on. Without a framework and support for conversation, I don’t know how much longer I’ll stay active on Twitter.

What Twitter was back then

When I joined Twitter in June 2009, the platform was just about to take off. By the end of the year, “Twitter” was declared the top word of 2009.

Twitter felt like a magical place at the time. It was the first major social media platform where the majority of posts were public and searchable. (In 2019, only ~13% of Twitter accounts were private.) Whatever you were interested in talking about, Twitter made it easy to discover kindred souls. The invention of the #hashtag in 2007 made it easy for users to find specific relevant content and communities.

The old Twitter was an essential place for me to discover, join, and cocreate the #eventprofs and #assnchat communities. For that, I’ll always be grateful.

In those days, running Twitter chats was viable and fun! Communities sprang up around shared interests and events. Twitter chats remained useful tools for a community for several years until the rise in hashtag spam reduced their popularity. Although a few Twitter chats still occur today, their glory days are over.

Mastodon is the old Twitter

Currently, Mastodon reminds me of the old Twitter. While engagement on Twitter is a shadow of its former self, I am seeing a significant rise in visits to my website — around 20% — since I started also posting on Mastodon. This is despite my having just a few hundred Mastodon followers. The graph below shows page views per month on www.conferencesthatwork.com for the fourteen years between 2009 and 2023. You can see the impact of the start of social media posting to Twitter in 2010, the four glory years of Twitter that started in 2014, the gradual decline and flattening that began around 2018, and the significant rise in July 2023 when I began reposting to Mastodon.

Mastodon is the old Twitter. Graph of the pageviews per month between 2010 and 2023 for my website conferencesthatwork.com. The graph shows the rise in views to ~200,000/month over the first four years, followed by a steep climb to ~750,000 until around 2017. Page views slowly decline to ~400,000/month until 2022 when Musk acquires Twitter and I start to post on Mastodon. Pageviews have rapidly increased by about 20% in 2023.

My posts on Mastodon are frequently liked and boosted; most of them far more frequently than the same posts are liked or retweeted on Twitter.

While my followers on Twitter have been stagnant since 2014, new people continue to find my content on Mastodon and follow me. Conversations on Twitter are now almost nonexistent, while on Mastodon I engage with other people every day.

Mastodon is a much better fit for me than today’s Twitter. It feels like the old Twitter. And with Mastodon’s no billionaire owner and no ads design, I’m optimistic that it may stay that way.

lowqualityfacts@mstdn.social Low Quality Facts @lowqualityfacts@mstdn.social Threads, Twitter, and Bluesky: Our billionaire is better than your billionaire. Mastodon: You actually don't need a billionaire at all. Threads, Twitter, and Bluesky: Hold on, we have to ask our billionaire if that's true.

The old Twitter is gone. Long live Mastodon, the old Twitter!